Wikipedia has stood by your side every time you scrambled to finish last-minute assignments, every time you needed proof to win an argument and of course, every time you went down a rabbit hole of weird articles. 

In November 2019, Indians alone accounted for 771 million visits to Wikipedia, proving the irreplaceable nature of Wikipedia’s existence. 

If you are amongst those visitors (and who are we kidding, of course, you are) you might’ve noticed a couple of advertisement banners on Wikipedia, desperately asking for donations. 

So why is it that one of the most popular websites in the world has to resort to making desperate pleas for donations? 

Why does Wikipedia need donations? 

First and foremost, Wikipedia is owned and run by the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) which is a nonprofit organization. 

What that means is that operations are run on funds collected mostly through donations. Each year, it costs $25 million to run the site. Wikipedia is edited by volunteer editors across the world who are unpaid. 

Based on guidance from the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees, our reserve amounts to one year of the operating budget, If there were circumstances that affected our ability to raise those funds during that period, we could end up in an urgent situation, the reserve is a safety net to protect Wikipedia against such a possibility,” said Samantha Lien, a spokeswoman for the Wikimedia Foundation. 

In 2014, WMF had assets worth more than $77 million, this figure has only kept on increasing over the years. 

Also Read: The Real Padman Of India Paved The Way For Menstrual Hygiene

Criticism of fundraising efforts 

It’s an advertisement that says ‘we will never run advertisements’. It’s an embarrassment to Wikipedia,” said Pete Forsyth, a former member of the Wikimedia Foundation’s fundraising team.

The advertisements in question are hard to miss. 

From bright yellow or orange banners spelling out doomsday warnings to relatively calmer banners, ‘humbly‘ asking for money, users have found the fundraising to be awkward at best and misleading at worst. 

Here’s the thing, despite the messages indicating the end of Wikipedia as you know it if you, dear user, don’t donate money, Wikipedia won’t disappear off the web anytime soon. 

Is the criticism justified? 

Wikipedia always has millions of dollars on reserve, enough to run the site smoothly for at least an entire year. 

Since it is an open-edited source and therefore does not pay its editors, the money collected is used to pay its long term employees, but some of these expenses have come under criticism. 

For instance, the WMF has in the past, paid for its employees’ cooking classes and even gym memberships. 

It’s misleading and slightly hypocritical of the organization to badger its visitors for donations when it’s making such frivolous expenses. 

It is common for nonprofits to keep a reserve of funds on standby in case of emergencies but at the same time, Wikipedia needs to be more transparent about how it uses its funds responsibly.

Image sources: Google Images

Sources: Washington Post, Business Insider, Smithsonian 

Find the blogger: @RoshniKahaHain

This post is tagged under: does wikipedia need donations, why is wikipedia asking for money, wikimedia foundation, is wikipedia out of money, wikipedia advertisements, is Wikipedia in trouble, Indian users, wikipedia fundraising campaign, wikipedia donations

Other Recommendations: 

If You Believe Wikipedia Is Not Biased You Should Definitely Read This



  1. Increasing someone’s salary is normally done in amounts bigger than a gym membership or a cooking class and might not have as good of an effect on the person’s motivation, productivity and, in the case of gym, health. Silly to call that frivolous (assuming you find having employees valuable)

  2. So google, a profit based enterprise, is glorified for providing gym and good coffee to its employees but Wikipedia is hypocrite and dishonest for doing the same?? They provide good service and I’ve donated a few bucks. Gladly.

  3. Wikipedia content is provided by the general public voluntarily. So they have no research costs.
    Surely the hosting charge of the website by the webserver is not that expensive.

  4. Wikipedia content is provided by the general public voluntarily. So they have no research costs.
    Surely the hosting charge of the website by the webserver is not that expensive. No I have not already said that.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here