FlippED is an ED Original style wherein two bloggers come together to share their opposing or orthogonal perspectives on an interesting subject.

The Nirbhaya incident happened in 2012 where a 23-year-old female physiotherapy intern was brutally raped and murdered. It’s 2020 now and her mother is still seeking justice for her daughter.

On the other hand, when a veterinarian doctor in Hyderabad was raped and murdered last year, police caught the alleged rapists. It has been speculated that the encounter that killed them was staged by the police because of the public pressure they received.

So is an encounter the better way to serve justice now?

Our bloggers fight it out.

Doing The Job Of Judiciary System

Before the rapists got handed over to the loopholed-law, they died in a police encounter.”

-Blogger Ayush

In 2011, after the US military took down Osama Bin Laden, instead of keeping his dead body as evidence, they drowned it in the ocean as they didn’t want his burial ground to be a shrine for his followers. Given that we humans memorialize the ones we idolize, it was well thought of.

Delay in serving justice because of the loopholes in the law

Despite the Supreme Court’s verdict of the death sentence being out for years in the Nirbhaya case, there have been constant delays in execution because of loopholes in the law. Also, India’s law got soft on one of the rapists for being a minor during the incident, although his actions were the most perverse and brutal.

However, in the Hyderabad case, before they got handed over to the loopholed-law, they died in a police encounter. They still died without enduring any torture while Disha’s last moments were gruesome and filled with pain.

Society mirroring the rapist’s thoughts

After the Nirbhaya incident, the BBC launched a documentary on it in 2015- titled India’s Daughter. It questioned the society along with the rapists on their thoughts about women. 

While the documentary showed that the rapists had no regret for their actions, the shock came when it was the society’s turn to answer. From ‘women ask for it’ to ‘they deserve it for wearing short clothes’, men (and women) came up with disturbing answers, as it showed what India thinks about her ‘daughters’.

These answers came from old men as well as school kids, and their answers didn’t differ much from the rapists. Somewhere it felt like that the judicial system’s actions or the lack of it, okay-ed such thoughts and heinous crimes.

Faster Judgment

Although encounters might seem brutal, if exemplified, people with similar thoughts will fear death before idealizing criminals and be scared to have thoughts similar to that of rapists. At least this way, they would know any perverse act that questions women’s safety will get them killed and they won’t have the Supreme Court or the President to delay any judgments.

Or worse, get away from one for being a minor.

Wasting Time and Money

Justice delayed is justice denied. Well, the law is doing exactly that in Nirbhaya’s case. As a death sentence judgment can be reviewed in 4 stages, and there being 4 convicts, the rapists are using this opportunity to postpone their hanging every time. Not only does this waste the Supreme Court’s time, but also wastes our, the taxpayer’s, money as the system is taken for a ride.  

Also Read: In Pics: Opposite Reactions By Famous People On The Hyderabad Encounter Of 4 Rape Accused

 Encounter Doesn’t Equate To Justice

“The aim of the judiciary is not just to punish the criminals, but also to ensure that no innocent person is falsely framed.”

-Blogger Ishita

Celebrating an encounter and preferring a resolution brought by a gun instead of one by law will set up a dangerous precedent. Opting for encounters will give rise to an anarchical and unlawful society.

Democracy And Rights

The system appears broken and flawed when one considers the amount of time it takes to come to a verdict in any case, even ones that were sensationalized, like the Nirbhaya case. 

However, one must remember that the aim of the judiciary is not just to punish the criminals, but also to ensure that no innocent person is falsely framed and made to endure a severe punishment.

Take the case of the Central Park jogger case of 1989, five minors were convicted for raping a woman and served time. Years later, the actual rapist confessed whose DNA matched with the one at the crime scene.

US President Donald Trump ran a full-page ad on The New York Times asking to bring back the death penalty, if they had been executed without due process, then a gross injustice would have occurred.

US president asked to bring the death penalty back

So, the process is designed this way to make sure that even if there is a slight chance that a person is being wrongly prosecuted, then the person has enough chances to prove that they are not guilty.

However, if encounters become the norm then we would be stripping people of their basic rights.

Ultimate Power

This line may have been said by a fictional crime lord, but if police are allowed to continue with their extra-judicial killing, then they will also attain this god-like status. They will have the power to decide the fate of a lot of people. 

There is a huge chance that a lot of police officers could and would exploit their power and get away with murder.

Being Bollywood Heroes

After the Priyanka Reddy case, social media was flooded with memes that called the police officers responsible for the infamous encounter as real-life Singham. 

However, her parents have stated to the media that when they complained about their missing daughter, the police did not believe them and theorized that she must have eloped with someone. 

If they had taken timely action maybe this tragedy could have been avoided. So, contrary to what people like to believe, they are no Bollywood heroes with golden hearts.

Improving The Judiciary

Indian courts have a backlog of over 3.3 crores cases. The judge to population ratio is 10 to 1 million.

Instead of granting more power to the police, we should focus on strengthening our judiciary system. We need more competent lawyers and judiciary officials. Only investigative work falls under the police’s jurisdiction, they shouldn’t be making decisions about people’s lives. There is a reason why we have three branches of government, these shouldn’t meddle with one another’s work.

Which side do you agree with? Tell us in the comments below.

Image Credits: Google Images

Sources: Business Today, Deccan Chronicle, India Today

Find The Bloggers:  @AyushArcher05 and @ishitabajpai6 

Other Recommendations:


  1. Don’t hang them. Hanging them, the suffering will be for a short time. Remove one leg and one hand. Let them suffer rest of their life. It will seen as brutal but it will be an example for others.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here