Disclaimer: Originally published in August 2017. It is being republished since it still remains an interesting topic till today. 

From the place I belong, there is a strong emerging trend among the youth of my age to increasingly associate themselves with the term “Pahadi”. As much as I would want to be a part of this solidarity, I cannot get myself to be.

Pahadi, to those who don’t know, broadly refers to people from Uttarakhand and Himachal Pradesh who claim themselves to be the rightful inhabitants of the Himalayas.

I have huge problems with the word, now that I have come to think of it. Let me give an insight to my dissatisfaction:

Geography – and I hate geography

We have divided ourselves solely on the basis of geography. I don’t think that geography holds any important validity in defining culture. What comes with it is the flawed belief that all people from the mountain communities have a singular culture that they subscribe to.

Do people who use pahadi as an umbrella term have any idea that cultures in the mountains are so vibrant that they vary from village-to-village? I am not even talking about a particular region here.

In fact, the cultures are so different that there is a particular kind of music that can be found only in some villages. The festival of Ramman, for example, is celebrated only in Salur-Dungra in Uttarakhand.

Uttarakhand doesn’t even have one concrete culture of its own. When Uttarakhand doesn’t, how can you club Himachal with it too?

Not being Pahadi
There are reasons why I wouldn’t want to call myself a Pahadi.

Also read: Why China Will Not Attack India From Arunachal Pradesh But This State Instead

Pahadi, what aPahadi?

It is sad to see that not every person who belongs to the mountains is considered under that umbrella. In popular opinion, Pahadi means someone from Uttarakhand or Himachal Pradesh.

The thing is, if you are really dividing people on the basis of geography, how come Kashmiris are lesser pahadis? It is important that you keep in mind that pahadi includes all the mountain and hill communities whether it is Sikkim or Idukki in Kerala.

If it is not that way, I don’t want to accept any definition of pahadi at all.

Itna chauvinism kahaan leke jaaoge?

What is this contempt for people who belong to the plains? I mean, I get that we have been ostracized a lot of times and many continue to either romanticize or demonize us, but I want a word that is absolutely free of chauvinism.

Calling oneself a pahadi is another way of being thankful that you do not belong to the plains. I don’t want that you declare someone as the other to define yourself. It’s like RSS defining nationalism on the basis of Pakistan.

Culture comes with a lot of weight to itself, and it is certainly not something that should be thrown around like confetti.

Yes, we do need solidarity, but we need solidarity that also speaks how different we are, and at the same time unites us. Solidarity does not mean painting a vast region with only one colour.

That’s blindness.

Image Credits: Google Images

Other recommendations:

The Day I Was Chased By A Brown Bear In Foot-Deep Snow


  1. Rawat… We are all pahadis! People of Himachal have ancestors in Kumaon, Garhwal and Jaunsar.People still marry with each other quite a lot. We are historically related to each other. As a matter fact, even many Nepalese people are pahadi and we are proud to be that.
    So, when people ask, we say we are Pahadis from…..whatever the name of our Village or Town is. These divisions are not appropriate for cultures who have assimilated with each soo much since centuries continously. How about you stop taking offense to it AND ACCEPT PAHADIS UNITING.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here