Although Polka Dot and Kusama resemble cousins and share some of their code, they are separate autonomous networks with different priorities and are not exactly the same. Kusama is recognized for its increased and early deployment, combined with its wild and quick nature and strong hold on experimentation. Conversely, Polka Dot is more traditional and places a premium on consistency and dependability. In the end, there are differences between the two cousins.

What is Kusama?

Kusama is a scalable network of blog changes built using a substrate that shares almost all of Polka Dot’s code.

 What exactly is a Polka Dot?

Polka Dot is considered a platform that allows diverse blockchains to carry out things like message transfers in a trusted fashion. In 2021, the Polka Dot will require traders and investors to prove that the tokens are worth investing in. The network is viewed as an experimental platform for the creation of an environment for teams that want to move quickly and creatively on it. Kusama was founded in 2019, and its creator is also Polka Dot’s co-founder. Every year that goes by, the Kusama price rises, and the gap between society and technology widens. Compared to its cousin, Polka Dot, the Kusama platform is designed to be risky and quick. Change agents may regain power, challenge the status quo, and spark innovation with the help of a living platform.

  • Speed and price

Teams that want to run a parachain must bind tokens as security. The bonding need is considerably lower for Kusama than for the Polka Dot. This greatly reduces the cost of the development environment.

Another obvious technological distinction between Polka Dot and Kusama is that the latter has altered governance guidelines that allow for quicker upgrades. As a result, Polka Dot is four times slower than Kusama. There is a 28-day voting period for the Polka Dot, and then there is a further 28-day enactment period. Kusama, on the other hand, has an 8-day enactment time after a 7-day voting session. This simply means that the stakeholders will need to exercise caution if they want to stay on top of all the suggestions, improvements, and validators on Kusama, as they frequently must come to hastily-agreed agreements.

The time needed to process the transaction is comparatively reduced; however, this does not imply that the Kusama blockchain is a speedier one. Kusama has the opportunity to develop more quickly and adapt better than Polka Dot due to the shorter intervals between governance activities like voting.

  • Canary network

Kusama was initially used as a canary network as a preproduction environment. Canary birds are a type of bird that was originally used by coal miners to assess levels of poisonous gases and other pollutants.

Similar to this, cranberry testing is a technique for validating software by releasing it to a small group of users, or, to put it another way, releasing it to a closed environment without endangering a large group of users.

A release that has been made by Kusama is regarded as a canary release. The majority of the time, these releases are orchestrated. Early Kusama candidates did not often use the network to experiment with new ideas and test out modifications. Kusama is not just a test network; it is a fully operational blockchain with built-in economic value and independent governance. The people who take part in Kusama will determine its future. Some teams will opt to stay solely on Osama, which is probably going to be the site of a lot more fascinating technological experiments. This use case is thought to be ideal, so experiments were conducted, leading to new ideas and innovations in areas such as monetary policy, incentives, and so on. It is recommended for projects that require high throughput but do not require bank-level security, such as gaming networks, social networking, and content distribution applications.

There are several projects maintaining parachains on both of these networks as businesses can experiment with and test new technologies and features on Kusama before bringing them to Polka Dot.

Both of these blockchain networks will eventually continue to exist as separate networks with their own communities and administrations. Even if these networks have very different use cases that are complementary to one another, they will nonetheless keep a strong connection with one another. Future applications to both of these networks 

In the near future, Kusama’s bridge to Polka Dot, which facilitates cross-network interoperability, is also anticipated.

The foundation has been taking the lead as the internet moves closer to Web 3.0, and this linkage will be a huge help and source of advice for teams creating for the ecosystem.

The differences in these networks are related to numerous other distinctions, as everything said above indicates. In the coming years, more people will likely adopt Kusama than Polkadot, but they will continue to be connected.



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here