A map is supposed to tell us where things are. But when borders are disputed, it also reveals whose version of geography is on display.
That debate resurfaced after the UN General Assembly passed a resolution on 4 September 2026, encouraging the use of equal-area map projections, including Equal Earth, to show the relative size of the world’s regions more accurately. The resolution passed with 164 votes in favour, one against and six abstentions. It is not legally binding.
India voted in favour, then clarified its position. The Ministry of External Affairs said India’s vote supported the principle of equal-area cartographic representation and should not be read as endorsing Equal Earth, or any other specific projection or depiction of national boundaries. India also reiterated that Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh must be represented according to India’s official map.
That distinction matters. Equal Earth is about how the globe is projected onto a flat map. The India-China-Pakistan dispute is about how territory and boundaries are represented.
So what happens when you look at India through five different maps?
Read more: ‘Absurd Claims:’ 5 Countries Join India In Rejecting China’s New Controversial Map
India’s official political map shows Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh within India’s boundaries. China’s 2023 Standard Map represents Arunachal Pradesh and Aksai Chin as part of China, a claim India rejects. Pakistan’s political map shows Jammu & Kashmir in line with its own territorial claim.
The UN takes a different approach. Its maps can distinguish between areas administered by India and Pakistan and show the Line of Control, while disclaimers make clear that the depiction of boundaries does not amount to endorsement of a particular territorial claim.
The Equal Earth map adds another layer. It is not a new set of borders. It is a projection designed to represent the relative area of landmasses more accurately than projections such as Mercator. The resolution concerns cartographic representation, not a legal redrawing of international boundaries.
It still mattered to India, because the UN’s own world map places Arunachal Pradesh and Aksai Chin between Indian and Chinese “claim lines”. New Delhi said any inaccurate or misleading depiction of its sovereign territory is unacceptable.
So the five maps aren’t simply five ways of drawing India. They reflect five purposes and perspectives — national claims, international mapping conventions and, with Equal Earth, an attempt to change how the world’s geography is visually represented.
Image Credits: Google Images
Sources: The Indian Express, Reuters, Hindustan Times
Find the blogger: @diptisadh
This post is tagged under: India map, India map controversy, Equal Earth map, Equal Earth projection, UN map controversy, India China map, India Pakistan map, Jammu Kashmir map, Ladakh map, Arunachal Pradesh map, Aksai Chin map, political maps, map projection, India territorial map, UN Equal Earth map
Disclaimer: We do not own any rights or copyrights to the images used; these images have been sourced from Google. If you require credits or wish to request removal, please contact us via email.
